Are approvals from the Bioethics Committee and URPL always required?

Are approvals from the Bioethics Committee and URPL always required?

Not always. The approvals required depend on the type of project and the status of the product involved — whether it is a medicinal product, medical device, dietary supplement, or a purely observational or survey-based study.

At Biostat®, we help sponsors and investigators precisely determine whether a Bioethics Committee approval, URPL notification or only an ethical opinion is needed. This ensures a smooth documentation process and prevents delays caused by formal errors.

General rules:

Clinical trial of a medicinal product — requires Bioethics Committee approval and URPL notification, in line with EU Regulation 536/2014. Approval must be obtained before patient recruitment begins.

Clinical investigation of a medical device — requires Bioethics Committee approval and URPL notification, in accordance with MDR 2017/745. This includes verification of technical documentation, safety assessment and the Clinical Investigation Plan. PMCF studies may have simplified requirements but still require approvals.

Observational (non-interventional) study — generally requires only a Bioethics Committee opinion. No URPL submission is required, but GDPR compliance and appropriate data protection procedures are mandatory.

Survey projects, registries, retrospective analyses — usually require an opinion from the Bioethics Committee indicating no objections, or a confirmation that the project is not a clinical trial or experiment. The key element is to ensure anonymity or adequate data security.

Many projects, however, fall into a “grey zone” — e.g., hybrid observational-interventional designs or retrospective analyses with clinical assessments — and this is when expert support is crucial.

Biostat® helps interpret regulations and choose the correct formal pathway to avoid misclassification by oversight bodies.

As part of this support, we prepare a complete list of required documents, including:

• the Bioethics Committee application with attachments,
• URPL submission (if required),
• protocol summary for the study registry,
• GDPR and data protection statements,
• investigator and sponsor declarations.

This results in a complete, submission-ready documentation package, minimising delays and resubmissions.

Biostat® understands how complex regulatory procedures can be. Our goal is to guide you from classification to final approval — efficiently, safely and in compliance with regulations.

 

Other questions: Types of research and regulatory aspects

See also

CTIS and RFIs without stress – how to effectively manage communication with regulators? CTIS and RFIs without stress – how to effectively manage communication with regulators?
The clinical trial assessment process in CTIS (Clinical Trials Information System) does not end with the submission of an application. One of the key stages ...
Where and how to register clinical trials, medical device studies, and observational studies? Where and how to register clinical trials, medical device studies, and observational studies?
Registration of studies in public information systems has become a standard in conducting research projects and an important element of scientific transparen...
How long does it take to prepare the full documentation required for a CTIS submission? How long does it take to prepare the full documentation required for a CTIS submission?
Preparing a complete documentation package for submission of a clinical trial in the CTIS system is a multi-stage process that in practice takes from several...
Copyright© 2023 Biostat